{"id":244072,"date":"2023-12-19T02:39:29","date_gmt":"2023-12-19T02:39:29","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lovemainstream.com\/?p=244072"},"modified":"2023-12-19T02:39:29","modified_gmt":"2023-12-19T02:39:29","slug":"gb-news-is-rapped-by-ofcom-again-over-dont-kill-cash-campaign","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lovemainstream.com\/world-news\/gb-news-is-rapped-by-ofcom-again-over-dont-kill-cash-campaign\/","title":{"rendered":"GB News is rapped by Ofcom again over Don't Kill Cash campaign"},"content":{"rendered":"
Under-fire\u00a0GB News received its latest official reprimand yesterday after one of its programmes promoted the channel’s Don’t Kill Cash campaign.<\/p>\n
The campaign called on the Government to ‘introduce legislation to protect the status of cash as legal tender and as a widely accepted means of payment in the UK until at least 2050’.<\/p>\n
But industry watchdog Ofcom ruled an episode of The Live Desk, shown on July 7, breached two parts of the Broadcasting Code on due impartiality.<\/p>\n
The programme invited viewers to sign a petition and discussed the problems of a cashless society.\u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
GB News is under fire from Ofcom for its ‘don’t kill cash’ campaign, to protect cash as legal tender in the UK until at least 2050 (File Image)<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
But Ofcom found the channel had breached two parts of the Broadcasting Code on due impartiality, after GB News only ‘offered limited references to different perspectives’ on a matter of political controversy and current policy (File Image)<\/p>\n
Ofcom found the topic was a matter of political controversy and current public policy as Parliament was passing a Bill on it at the time.<\/p>\n
GB News offered ‘only limited references to different perspectives,’ the ruling said.<\/p>\n
It is the fifth time the channel has been rapped for failing to follow such rules since its launch two years ago. Ofcom is running five more probes involving Don’t Kill Cash.<\/p>\n
The network said: ‘We maintain our campaign was not political and so did not consider it invoked due impartiality rules.’<\/p>\n