{"id":243420,"date":"2023-12-10T09:04:12","date_gmt":"2023-12-10T09:04:12","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/lovemainstream.com\/?p=243420"},"modified":"2023-12-10T09:04:12","modified_gmt":"2023-12-10T09:04:12","slug":"interactive-map-reveals-how-many-economically-inactive-live-near-you","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/lovemainstream.com\/world-news\/interactive-map-reveals-how-many-economically-inactive-live-near-you\/","title":{"rendered":"Interactive map reveals how many 'economically inactive' live near YOU"},"content":{"rendered":"
More than seven million people in Great Britain have no interest in finding a job, MailOnline can reveal.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Figures collated from official statistics show that 17.5 per cent of the working age (16-64) population in England, Wales and Scotland is uninterested in finding a job.<\/p>\n
Officially, there are 8.7 million people designated as ‘economically inactive’ by the Office for National Statistics (ONS) – meaning they have not looked for a job for four weeks or are unable to start working for at least a fortnight.<\/p>\n
The problem can be so extreme that 100 per cent of out-of-work people in some areas of the country are considered to be disengaged from looking for work altogether – despite almost a million job vacancies being advertised nationwide.<\/p>\n
Our interactive map shows that 15 local authorities across Britain have an economically inactive working-age population with no-one that intends to find a job.<\/p>\n
Your browser does not support iframes.<\/p>\n
\u00a0<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Around 7.1 million people who are economically inactive do not want a job, according to official figures (stock image)<\/p>\n
Among the areas with thousands of people aged 16-64 who do not want to work are Ashford in Kent, the Derbyshire Dales, North Devon, Stevenage and Oxford.<\/p>\n
Folkstone and Hythe, Rochford, Lincoln, Selby, Bolsover, Cannock Chase, Dartford, the Orkney Islands and Torridge are also home to thousands working age locals who have not been looking for a job for four weeks – and don’t want to, either.<\/p>\n
It comes as the government plots an overhaul of the welfare system in order to reduce the number of people out of work and bring down costs.\u00a0<\/p>\n
The number of people on Universal Credit surged during the coronavirus pandemic – at present, an estimated 2.4 million people on the benefit are signed off sick with no requirement to find a job.<\/p>\n
The rise has been driven by people switching from older benefits onto the new-style system – and by a rise in long-term sickness, which the government says should not be an obstacle to finding work.<\/p>\n
Under the Work Capability Assessment, which is used to determine if people can receive additional benefits payments because of long-term sickness, eligible claimants can receive \u00a3390 a month (\u00a34,681 per year) in extra payments.<\/p>\n
But the Chancellor, Jeremy Hunt, unveiled plans to revamp the assessment shortly before last month’s Autumn Statement – meaning thousands of people with long-term health problems will be told to look for work they can do from home.<\/p>\n
Among the changes proposed is a plan to drop the requirement to be able to walk 50 metres unaided – because the rise in home working means people who cannot do this can still seek employment.<\/p>\n
Your browser does not support iframes.<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Matlock, in the Derbyshire Dales area. The local authority area has thousands of economically inactive people – 100 per cent of whom say they do not want to find work<\/p>\n
<\/p>\n
Oxford also has thousands of economically inactive locals – 22.6 per cent of the working-age population – none of whom have expressed a desire to find a job<\/p>\n
The ‘Chance To Work Guarantee’, as it has been branded, will come into effect in 2025 and will affect around 370,000 people by 2028\/29.\u00a0<\/p>\n
Detailing the plans on November 22, Mr Hunt said it was ‘wrong economically and wrong morally’ to sign people onto benefits with no requirement to look for work.\u00a0<\/p>\n
The Institute for Fiscal Studies think tank estimates that overhauling the system would save the government \u00a3900million a year; the Treasury says it will save up to \u00a31.2billion a year by 2028-29.<\/p>\n
But critics say that the changes do not fully consider the additional supports that disabled people may need in order to work at their best.<\/p>\n
Anastasia Berry, policy manager at the MS Society, said the ‘cynical attack’ on benefits will have a ‘devastating’ effect on those with multiple sclerosis.<\/p>\n
She claimed that only one in 10 jobs advertised offered the option of home working – reducing the pool of jobs that people with disabilities may be able to apply for.<\/p>\n
Ms Berry added: ‘This approach will have dire consequences for disabled people, including those with MS \u2013 a condition which can be debilitating, exhausting and unpredictable, and will only progress over time.\u00a0<\/p>\n
‘The Government can, and must, do better by disabled people by scrapping these damaging changes.’<\/p>\n
James Taylor, director of strategy at charity Scope, told The Times: ‘I think around 20 to 30 per cent of (disabled people) would like a job but the support you need to give them is quite different to someone who’s perhaps a bit more work-ready.’<\/p>\n
Debra Baxter, a 58-year-old woman with cerebral palsy who uses a wheelchair,says she has experienced discrimination while working.<\/p>\n
She told the paper: ‘When (managers) are non-disabled they have the attitude of: “We know best, you will do what we say”.’<\/p>\n